Arthurs Empire? http://mampire.com/

Originally Posted by doggystyle

agree, but you dont have to be sherlock holmes to figure out that arthur is the owner of the website. the first two words at the websites say it.

if he would try to hide that fact you could be but so this thread is just

He did try to hide it when he announced mamble.com at mamboportal.com:


http://www.mamboportal.com/content/view/1147/2/

Read comment 3 from top and 2 from bottom.


My last words on this issue.

[jomaco1]

Originally Posted by eyezberg

and who told you about mampire anyway, no announcement I saw anywhere..?

http://mambers.com/showthread.php?t=...light=adserver

[staufj22]

All these talk of various site names makes me suspecious that Authur might be posting under other aliases as well.. some of those die-hard supporter posts looks damn suspecious!
I'm not surprised that the core dev team takes everything from Authur with a grain of salt.

[jomaco1]

Originally Posted by staufj22

All these talk of various site names makes me suspecious that Authur might be posting under other aliases as well.. some of those die-hard supporter posts looks damn suspecious!
I'm not surprised that the core dev team takes everything from Authur with a grain of salt.

I know who you are.

[Farrukh]

I think that we should stop all this.

Let aurthur do what he wishes.

[fede-k3]

Hey ppl!! Grow Up!!
As if you wouldnt do such things if you were business men!!
Come ON!!!

I have my own 'small company' of web design and i refer to my site as if i were a 3rd person... and it's OK..!!!

It would be nice if it says...
'I recommend MY SITE on BLA BLA BLA...'

Its better...
'I recommend THE SITE on BLA BLA BLA...'

just an example...
and read this...
GROW UP!

[manuman]

I always have something to say...

Cross marketing between business's owned and/or operated by the same entity is common practice all over the world. Why your making such a big deal about Arthur doing it is very strange.

At the end of the day if you don't like it don't use it.

[marcoshac]

Hello,

I don´t see any problem at all about Arthur and all his websites for Mambo and Mambo users...

He is a great contributor of and for the community. Also, he is filling some of the community needs (which no one also saw the need or take an action to fill it). So, why not be proud and be at least recognized by that???

So, yes, Arthur has my support and gratitude so far....

Regards,

Marcos

[mambovince]

I have said it before, and I'll say it until some people either get sick of me or they finally understand that to be seen as an un-biased criticism, you need to;

"Keep your eye on the ball, not the player"

In this case, the 'ball' is anyone promoting other sites they have an active interest in as if a 3rd party.

As Arthur is only 1 individual from 100,000's doing this, criticise the actual methods, not just 1 individual. He is not the 1st, and will not be the last.

As mentioned already in this thread, the worst offenders are the ones that hide any details and try to cover any links. Arthur has not done this.

Some of the Worlds largest companies do this every day. Look at some of the small print in some advertising/ cross selling campaigns. Especially the ones that offer a discount or something free from a 'seemimngly' different company.

So unless this and any similar type of issue is discussed as suggested above, you will be seen as if you have a personal agenda aginst that person, and could legally fall fowl of victimisation.

Nuff said.

V

[alphanostrum]

why the people always breakt the head over other people things? as long as one does not collide with it, everything is irrelevant.